CO129-078 - Sir Robinson - 1860 [7-12] — Page 285

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

2.

3

mi

Prussian Service, or whose claim to him was to be preferred, the Prussian or the American, nor has the Prussian law any bearing on the case. Doubtless had the course indicated by law and courtesy been followed, the man would have been handed over to the Elbe under the Extradition Treaty, and would be now for my letter No 922 of 10th instant was "taking into his custody without previous "Communication with the local Authorities. "a person who was in the waters of this "Colony, and under the protection of British "laws."

Upon this point you appear to consider that the voluntary surrender of himself by the deserter gives the matter a different aspect from that which it would have assumed, had he been made a prisoner against his will.; but you will, I am sure at once perceive the error of this assumption when it is pointed out to you that no action on the man's part as between himself and the Naval Authorities of his Country can in any way alter or affect the rights of

The sole complaint against the Captain of the Elbe is that he was in legal custody on board that ship, but the Captain of the Elbe by exceeding the privilege claimed by war has prevented the adoption of the regular course of procedure, and formal


230

Edit History

2026-05-18 19:13:51 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
2. 3 mi Prussian Service, or whose claim to him was to be preferred, the Prussian or the American, nor has the Prussian law any bearing on the case. Doubtless had the course indicated by law and courtesy been followed, the man would have been handed over to the Elbe under the Extradition Treaty, and would be now for my letter No 922 of 10th instant was "taking into his custody without previous "Communication with the local Authorities. "a person who was in the waters of this "Colony, and under the protection of British "laws." Upon this point you appear to consider that the voluntary surrender of himself by the deserter gives the matter a different aspect from that which it would have assumed, had he been made a prisoner against his will.; but you will, I am sure at once perceive the error of this assumption when it is pointed out to you that no action on the man's part as between himself and the Naval Authorities of his Country can in any way alter or affect the rights of The sole complaint against the Captain of the Elbe is that he was in legal custody on board that ship, but the Captain of the Elbe by exceeding the privilege claimed by war has prevented the adoption of the regular course of procedure, and formal 230
Baseline (Original)
2. 3 mi Prussian Service, or whose claim to - him was to be preferred, the Prussian or the American, nor has the Prussian law any bearing on the case. Doubtless had the course indicated law and courtesy been by followed the man would have been handed over to the Elbe under the Extradition Treaty, and would be now- 230 for my letter Ne 922 of 10th instant was "taking into his custody without previous "Communication with the local Authorities. " a person who was in the waters of this - "Colony, and under the protection of British "laws." - Upon this point you appear to consider that the voluntary surrender of himself by the deserter gives the matter a different in legal custody on board that ship, but the Captain of the Elbe by exceeding the privilege claimed by and war has prevented. accorded to men of the adoption of the regular course of procedure. and - formal The sole complaint against the Captain of the Elbe ao advanced in aspect from that which it would have - assumed, had he been made a against his will.; but prisoner you will, I am sure at once perceive the error of this assumption when it is pointed out to you that no action and on the man's part as between himself the Naval Authorities of his Country can in any way alter or affect the rights of "
2026-05-18 19:13:51 · Baseline
View content

2.

3

mi

Prussian Service, or whose claim to -

him

was

to be preferred, the Prussian

or the American, nor has the Prussian

law any bearing

on the case.

Doubtless had the course

indicated law and courtesy been

by

followed

the man would have been

handed over to the Elbe under the

Extradition Treaty, and would be now-

230

for

my letter Ne 922 of 10th instant was "taking into his custody without previous "Communication with the local Authorities.

" a person who was in the waters of this - "Colony, and under the protection of British

"laws." -

Upon this point you appear to consider

that the voluntary surrender of himself

by

the deserter gives the matter a

different

in legal custody

on

board that ship,

but the Captain of the Elbe by

exceeding the privilege claimed by

and

war has prevented.

accorded to men of the adoption of the regular course of procedure.

and

- formal

The sole complaint against the

Captain of the Elbe

ao advanced in

aspect from that which it would have -

assumed, had he been made a

against his will.; but

prisoner

• you will, I am sure at once perceive the error of this assumption when it is pointed

out to

you

that no action

and

on the man's part as between himself the Naval Authorities of his Country can

in any way

alter or affect the rights of

"

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.